Acting on What Really Matters in Strategy Execution!

With so many strategic initiatives failing, it is clear thereWritten plainly and simply, clear expectations and
is a chasm between what is said and what actuallyspecific outcomes are the first critical step in creating a
happens - too much talk and not enough action. Hollowsuccessful execution plan.
promises of sharper execution and new executiveThe right people in the right place
talent appear in the news with tedious regularity - as ifLeaders don't usually think very hard about choosing
it were the latest breakthrough in management thinking.the right people for the right jobs. They don't always
New initiatives fail because managers use flawedhave accurate views about what some of the key
approaches to follow through.execution jobs involve and what kind of people they
But if execution is so critical to success, why don'tneed. As a result, leaders end up with pedestrian
more companies take a disciplined approach to it?managers leading vital teams - managers with "ready
Why do many businesses put so much effort intoaim-aim-aim syndrome" who struggle to make the right
crafting the "perfect" strategy and then screw it updecisions.
with a slapdash approach to execution.If you want a team that performs well, you need to
Countless strategies are designed without taking intomatch people to each task. The most suitable person
account the organisations ability to execute it. Strategyto sing the tenor part in an opera is the tenor. No one
tends to be restricted to a few senior managers andwould think about asking a baritone to tackle the tenor
not widely shared. Classically, it is too abstract and toopart. This is common sense? Yes, it is sense - but not
shallow. As a result, it is poorly understood by thethat common.
people who have to implement it.Meaningful Plans
A basic problem with execution is that managersMilestones bring a strategy to life. Yet it's still surprising
know more about planning than doing. Managers arehow many major "plans" are described in a few hazy
trained to plan, not to execute plans. More often thanparagraphs accompanied by a worthless Bar Chart.
not, the separation between planning and doing isYou wouldn't accept a quote from a builder that said
problematic. Managers behave as if "doing" requires"House - 12 months, 500,000 pounds" would you? You
less intelligence than "planning." It is common to hearwould need a lot more information. With such a low
the doers described as "grunts" - people who are lesslevel of detail, it's unlikely that the builder would
intellectually gifted than the planners. The unspokenunderstand it himself. But if the builder could provide a
message is clear - "doing" is not a noble pursuit.weekly breakdown of key activities, everyone would
What is more, companies focus on too many thingshave a clearer understanding of what needs to be
simultaneously. No company can concentrate on moredone and by when.
than three or four critical issues at one time.Creating a plan breaks things down into manageable
Attempting to focus on more is a widespread problem.chunks but also forces everyone to think through what
Any manager who says he has ten priorities to jugglethey need to do and how their work fits in with others.
with has lost sight of what the important issues are.This is a critical part of making things happen.
The simpler the view of what you have to do, theEffective Controls
more focus you will have. The best performers in anyThe failure to follow through is widespread in business
field are those who see what they do as simple inand a major cause of poor execution. You have to
nature - but difficult at the same time. Take ahave meaningful controls and a dynamic review
marathon, for example. The runner starts and doesn'tprocess. An execution culture relies on robust debate -
stop until he has completed 26.2 miles. It is simple - butand this means a climate where there is a frank and
it is not easy.open exchange.
Execution failure is not a single shattering event. ItRealism is at the heart of execution. Organisations are
doesn't happen overnight. Just because nothing badfull of people who want to avoid reality. Reality makes
happens in week two or month two of a programme,them feel uncomfortable. The mantra is "we don't
doesn't mean that disaster is not on its way. Executionwant to look bad" or "we want to look better than
failure is a few errors in judgement, repeated everythey do". What is needed is a "what are you going to
day - eventually leading to an execution debacle.do about it" attitude and much more intensity in the
Execution success comes from doing ordinary thingsreview process.
exceptionally well. The problem is that these simpleLeaders must create a climate where there are no
disciplines are easy not to do. Time after time, this isnon-discussables - and where dissent is legitimate.
the root cause of the mess we see in execution.People cannot be expected to be open if they are
Four basic disciplines create a solid platform forfearful. If leaders are open and constructive, focused
execution success. These are:on helping teams to solve problems, others will take
the hint and the execution process will benefit.
1. Clear direction on the relevant business issueExecution is not rocket science but it is, quite definitely,
2. The right people in the right placea neglected management discipline. Business
3. Rational plansmanagement education reveres policy making and
4. Effective Controlsplanning - but execution skills have to be learned on the
Clarity on the business issuejob.
Being precise on the critical issue is vital to success.The cornerstones of execution are simple - but not
This clarifies expectations and eliminates theeasy. Managers can get away with ignoring the
vagueness that people get away with in everydaydisciplines for weeks or months, without any obvious
conversation. Objectives and outcomes need to besign of problems. But, disaster is never far away.
succinct. They should be written down unambiguously.Management literature admires companies who are
People involved in the execution process should not beregarded as good "examples" of execution - so called
required to read between the lines.models of excellence. Equally, there are companies
Company announcements on vital programmes arewho serve as "warnings." If a book is written about
frequently couched in long and flabby nouns ofyour company, make sure your business stands out
generalised meaning. Language is congealed and webecause it is an example- and not a warning!
don't feel inclined to read it.