Disability Attorney Notes - Importance of Careful Billing Records

The Court considers five factors in determiningcase, the less expertise the case would require.
whether to award disability attorney fees.4. The inability of the attorney to accept other cases in
1) Did the ERISA governed disability insurance plan actorder to handle the claim. A more complex case might
in bad faith? Was it guilty of forcing the claimant intonot allow a disability attorney to work on other claims
Court?at the same time, or at least greatly reduce the
2) Does the Plan or administrator of the disability plannumber of concurrent clients the disability attorney can
have the ability to pay the fees if the Court awardswork with.
them?5. The customary fee of other attorneys practicing in
3) Would awarding the disability attorney fees act as athe same specialty. This is where the affidavits of
deterrent in the future?other disability attorneys come in.
4) Did the legal decision have the potential to benefit6. Whether the attorney charges a fixed fee or
other plan members?contingent fees. How an attorney charges fees can
5) How did the relative merits of each side compare?be a relevant factor.
While the Court has the right to order the disability7. Time limitations imposed by the client or the
insurance plan to pay the disability attorney's fees ifcircumstances. This factor is comparable to #4, but
even one of the above conditions are met, in mostnot quite identical.
cases, the Court only considers the awarding of fees8. The amount of money involved in settling the claim
if more than one of the five factors applies.and the results obtained. The more money involved,
First and foremost, the Court looks at whether thethe more likely the disability insurance company or plan
disability attorney succeeded in winning a substantialis culpable.
part of the litigation. Then the Court moves on to9. The experience, reputation, and ability of the disability
considering whether the disability insurance plan had aattorney(s).
justifiable position that was taken in good faith. If it did10. The 'undesirability' of the disability benefits case.
so, the Court may determine that awarding ofSome cases are more risky for a disability attorney to
attorney's fees is not appropriate.take.
Once the Court has determined that compensation to11. The nature and length of the professional
the disability lawyer is appropriate, ERISA establishes arelationship with the client. Some cases take many
clear set of guidelines. Disability lawyers are onlyyears to bring to a just result.
allowed to invoice hours spent productively pursuing12. Awards paid by other courts in similar cases. The
successful litigation efforts. Neither hours assisting aCourt does compare decisions reached by other
disability claimant during the administrative appealsCourts across the United States.
process nor hours spent pursuing information that laterAt the end of the day, a disability insurance attorney
proves useless are billable.can blow it by failing to keep careful records. It does
The invoice for the disability attorney's fees must beabsolutely no good to have the Court determine that
itemized carefully. Sufficient details should be presentthe victor in a disability lawsuit has the right to
so that the Court can determine whether the workcompensation for attorney's fees, if the attorney fails
performed is clearly connected to the litigation. This isto do his/her part. A recent case, Pakovich v. Verizon
not mere politeness. ERISA demands this so the CourtPlan, demonstrates this. The Judge agreed that it was
can recognize when excessive, redundant orappropriate to review the disability attorney's rights to
otherwise unnecessary charges have been included.compensation, even though a prior court ruling had
In addition to this information, ERISA requires thedenied the right.
disability attorney to use a reasonable hourly rate. TheUnfortunately, the invoicing presented by the attorney
disability attorney must provide affidavits from otherstripped the Judge of any power to establish
disability attorneys practicing in the same area statingappropriate compensation. The required detailed
what those attorneys charge to represent long-terminvoicing was absent. The necessary affidavits
or short-term disability claimants. This gives the Courtconfirming the appropriate disability attorney rates
fees to compare. When the disability insurance planwithin the Massachusetts district were not produced.
disagrees with the rate asked by the disability attorney,The Court had no option but to deny the motion for
the Court is able to use these figures to evaluate theattorney fees.
appropriateness of the fees. The Court will alsoProviding superior disability attorney services to clients
consider the expertise of the disability attorney ingoes beyond securing a reversal of a disability plan's
determining a fair rate.denial of disability benefits. It also includes doing
The Court uses 12 factors to adjust the finaleverything possible to reduce the costs to the client.
settlement. Each factor may work alone or combineWhen a disability attorney keeps sloppy records and
forces with the others.fails to comply with the basic requirements of ERISA
1. The time and labor involved in comparison to thethat lawyer has failed to practice law in the most
complexity of the case. The more protracted a case,ethical way possible. The best disability attorneys strive
the more hours the Court will expect on the invoice.to establish all the evidence necessary to secure fair
2. The novelty and difficulty of the questions broughtcompensation for the attorney fees connected with
before the Court. Some cases present a greaterrepresenting his/her client. This shows moral
challenge, which the Court recognizes it would takeresponsibility.
more time to research.Do more than help your clients to obtain their rightful
3. The skill the attorney had to possess in order todisability benefits. Help them keep as much of the
provide acceptable legal services. The simpler thesettlement as possible.