| Chapter 10 DWI Lawyer Bob Keefer: DUI Guilt Myth | | | | A pre-trial conference is an opportunity for the |
| Â | | | | prosecutor and your attorney to discuss various |
| Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â | | | | options to resolve your case without a trial. The district |
| CHAPTER 10 | | | | attorney will offer a plea deal that you will consider |
| Â | | | | with your attorney. If you choose to take the district |
| “MY CASE IS GOING TO TRIAL—HOW DO I | | | | attorney’s offer, or to have your attorney counter |
| PREPARE? “ | | | | with an offer of your own, your case may be |
| Â | | | | resolved at this stage. If not, then you are set to go on |
| You do not have to know everything about the trial | | | | to a jury trial. |
| process and how to argue your case—that is what | | | | Trial |
| an attorney is for. This chapter is simply meant to help | | | | The U. S. Constitution guarantees each criminal |
| you understand the basics of what the trial process | | | | defendant the right to a speedy and public trial. |
| looks like and the kinds of arguments that work in your | | | | Because of busy trial calendars in many courthouses, |
| favor. | | | | the right to a speedy trial has been given specific |
| Â | | | | guidelines, which vary from State to State. These |
| Arraignment | | | | guidelines set time limits on how long you have to wait |
| Â | | | | before your trial. If you are still in custody, you probably |
| The process begins with an arraignment, which will be | | | | will not have to wait as long as you would if you were |
| the first time you appear in court. At your arraignment | | | | released on you own recognizance. If your lawyer |
| you will receive a copy of the police report and the | | | | needs more time to build your case, do an investigation |
| District Attorney’s charges against you. Your | | | | or file motions, he or she can request that these time |
| lawyer will enter a plea of not guilty for you, and then | | | | limits be extended. However, this decision to delay the |
| dates are set for motions, pre-trial conference and trial. | | | | trial is ultimately up to you: only you can waive your |
| Pretrial Motions | | | | right to a speedy trial. |
| After your arraignment, the process of arguing your | | | | Â |
| case will begin. After your attorney has thoroughly | | | | The jury trial is a hearing in which all of the evidence is |
| reviewed the facts, the next step is to file pretrial | | | | presented to 7 for a misdemeanor or 12 jurors for a |
| motions. A motion is a document that your attorney | | | | felony, with the judge presiding. The trial will have |
| files on your behalf asking the Court (i.e. the judge) for | | | | witnesses from both sides, including the officer or |
| a certain action. There are several different types of | | | | officers who observed you from the time you were |
| motions, each with a different goal. But filing successful | | | | stopped until you were released from jail, as well as |
| motions, no matter what the specific type, will help you | | | | expert witnesses who will testify regarding the tests |
| and your attorney to shape the trial process in a way | | | | that were taken at the police station. You may also |
| that benefits your case. | | | | testify if you and your lawyer decide it is a good idea, |
| • Motion to SuppressWhen the prosecutors begin | | | | and you may also call other people, such as |
| preparing their case against you, they start by | | | | passengers, who will testify on your behalf. |
| collecting all the evidence that supports their claim that | | | | The process of selecting 7 or 12 jurors from a large |
| you were breaking the law. However, just because | | | | pool of potential jurors is called “voir dire.” Both |
| they have collected it and want to present it at trial | | | | sides—your lawyer and the district attorney—want |
| does not mean that it is automatically admissible. There | | | | to choose jurors who will be most sympathetic to their |
| are strict legal requirements that determine whether a | | | | case. In voir dire, both sides are allowed to ask |
| piece of evidence can be presented at trial. An | | | | questions of potential jurors and each side is allowed |
| important part of making your case is arguing that the | | | | to “challenge,” or reject, a certain number of |
| evidence that the prosecutors want to present at trial | | | | potential jurors without having to provide a reason. The |
| does not meet these requirements and therefore | | | | idea behind the process is that, if both sides are |
| cannot be used against you. | | | | allowed to challenge potential jurors that they believe |
| A motion to suppress asks the court to | | | | are biased against them, the jury will be fairly balanced |
| “suppress” or exclude certain evidence from a | | | | when all is said and done. |
| trial because it was obtained improperly or illegally by | | | | Once the jury is selected, the trial will officially begin |
| the police officer. For example, a motion to suppress | | | | with each side offering opening statements. The |
| might argue that the officer did not have probable | | | | opening statement that your lawyer makes to the jury |
| cause to pull you over. This motion would need to | | | | provides an overview of your version of what |
| argue that the officer’s belief that you were | | | | happened. It is a story that your lawyer will attempt to |
| committing a crime was not “reasonable.” This | | | | persuade the jury of by providing evidence, questioning |
| means that the officer’s justification for pulling you | | | | witnesses and poking holes in the prosecution’s |
| over must be something he actually saw. An | | | | version of events. But before your attorney can |
| anonymous tip, for example, would not be enough. If | | | | present your case fully, the prosecutors must present |
| this motion were successful, all evidence that was | | | | theirs. In a jury trial, the prosecution always presents its |
| made possible by pulling you over (which is nearly | | | | case first. In a certain way, this works in your favor |
| everything) might also be suppressed. | | | | because the jurors—like the rest of us—are more |
| Â | | | | liable to remember what they heard last. Finally, once |
| A motion to suppress might also question the results | | | | all the evidence has been presented and all the |
| of the BAC tests that you took at the police station. | | | | witnesses have testified, both sides will present closing |
| Recall the discussion in chapter 6 about the various | | | | arguments. The jury will then be given its instructions |
| factors that can make the tests unreliable. Any of | | | | as to how to weigh the evidence presented to them, |
| these reasons might be used as a basis to argue that | | | | after which they will begin deliberation. Once the jury |
| the test results should be suppressed. | | | | finishes deliberating, all that is left is for them to present |
| Â | | | | their verdict. |
| •Discovery Motion | | | | Expert Witness Testimony |
| Â | | | | At some point during the trial your lawyer will probably |
| This type of motion asks the prosecutor to release | | | | decide to call an “expert” to testify. Experts can |
| additional evidence. Discovery is based on the idea | | | | be called to testify about the chemical tests, field |
| that the defense is entitled to all the information that will | | | | sobriety tests, accident reconstruction, and other |
| be used by prosecutors in their attempt to convict. | | | | scientific aspects of your case. |
| Most of the time the prosecution will simply give your | | | | Â |
| lawyer the evidence, making a discovery motion | | | | Chemical Tests: Experts can discuss flaws with |
| unnecessary. | | | | breath, blood and urinalysis tests. For example, the |
| There is an informal discovery process that happens | | | | breath machine was not properly calibrated or |
| between the prosecution and the defense, without the | | | | fermentation occurred in the blood and a higher alcohol |
| judge getting involved. Each side provides the other | | | | reading resulted. |
| with a list of the information that they would like to be | | | | Field Sobriety Tests: Field sobriety tests are not |
| given. The kinds of evidence that your attorney will | | | | considered “scientific,” but the results can work |
| receive in this informal discovery process include things | | | | in your favor if your lawyer calls an expert witness to |
| like the names and addresses of prosecution | | | | testify on your behalf. If you performed reasonably |
| witnesses, statements made by you, relevant | | | | well on the field sobriety test—displaying good |
| evidence seized or obtained as part of the | | | | balance, coordination, attention and reasoning—the |
| investigation, results of scientific tests, and all written or | | | | expert can use your performance on the field sobriety |
| recorded statements of witnesses whom the | | | | test to support the opinion that you were not under the |
| prosecutor intends to call at a prospective trial. | | | | influence at the time of driving. If you showed signs of |
| However, if either side refuses to provide a piece of | | | | physical impairment but not mental impairment, the |
| evidence that the other side requested, then a formal | | | | expert will testify that, because alcohol always affects |
| discovery process begins. This process requires filing | | | | your mind before your body, the physical impairment |
| motions so that the judge can decide whether to order | | | | was probably due to something other than alcohol. |
| that the prosecution give your lawyer the evidence | | | | Â |
| you want. | | | | Alcohol Level at Time of Driving vs. at Time of Testing: |
| Â | | | | The use of BAC tests at trial is based on the |
| • Motion to strike prior DUI convictions. | | | | assumption that, if a person was impaired at the time |
| Â | | | | of the test, they must have been impaired at the time |
| This motion asks the Court to make it so that any prior | | | | of driving. In other words, the assumption is that the |
| DUI convictions from the last ten years are not taken | | | | BAC falls as time passes. Experts can be called to |
| into account when deciding a sentence. As you might | | | | rebut this assumption in certain cases. Under certain |
| expect, the penalty goes up with each additional DUI | | | | circumstances the BAC could actually be rising, which |
| you get. | | | | means it is higher at the time of the test than when |
| Â | | | | driving. Since this is an extremely technical area, an |
| However, there must be a reason to file the motion. | | | | expert is essential to explain it to the jury and raise |
| Something must have happened that led you to and | | | | reasonable doubt as to whether the person was over |
| your attorney to believe that the officer’s past | | | | the legal limit at the time of driving. |
| conduct should be called into question. The motion | | | | Â |
| must provide a specific fact so the judge can decide if | | | | Accident Reconstruction: If there was an accident |
| there is sufficient reason to look into the officer’s | | | | before the arrest, an expert in the field of accident |
| past. | | | | reconstruction may be used to reconstruct the events |
| Â | | | | of the accident based on facts in the case. The |
| The more of these motions that are | | | | accident reconstruction expert can testify regarding |
| successful—suppression, discovery, strike prior DUI | | | | the mechanics of the accident, and give his or her |
| convictions, pitches—the more likely the case against | | | | opinion regarding whether or not the accident was the |
| you will simply be dismissed without a trial. If not, your | | | | fault of the impaired driver, the other party, or would |
| case proceeds to a pre-trial conference. | | | | have been unavoidable regardless of impairment. |
| Pretrial conference | | | | |