EQ Vs IQ

In the business world, we are always looking for waysexecutives hire or promote managers who fail to
to gain advantage over the competition. For manyconnect with or motivate their employers?
years organizations thought that bright, intelligent peopleI spent 27 years hiring managers, who, in turn, hired
were the key to superior performance. But "booksales and administrative people. My own observation
smarts," in the form of high IQs or stellar GPAs, weindicates that a little dissatisfaction or unhappiness with
now know, don't always translate to equally exemplarythe past and/or the current state is often a good thing.
job performance. The connection is limited at best.Managers and leaders who are always happy with
An intelligence quotient (IQ) is a measure of cognitivethe current situation are not too motivated to change it.
capacity--one's ability to think and reason. IQ usuallyMany successful entrepreneurs and leaders are happy
does not change much after the age of 12 to 15. Manybut dissatisfied with the current state. The
non-manual jobs require an above-average IQ; that is,dissatisfaction drives them to create change or make
they have "a high IQ threshold." But hiring people withsomething better.
high IQs is not a guarantee that they will perform wellAnother mood that impacts results is optimism--the
in the position.view of the world as a positive place and the future
The answer to why that is may rest in a conversationas bright and achievable. An optimistic mood is almost
that took place between two psychology professors,a necessary quality among leaders, as it imbues their
John Mayer and Peter Salovey, in 1987. Salovey, oflanguage with hope and possibility for desired
Yale University, and Mayer, of the University of Newoutcomes.
Hampshire, were discussing a particular, bumblingDifferentiating between the true optimist and pessimist
politician and poised the question: How could someoneis easy, according to Joshua Freedman, author of The
so smart act so inexplicably dumb? They came to theArt of Leadership: How to Get Results with Emotional
conclusion that good decision-making requires moreIntelligence. Freedman claims the optimist looks at an
than intellect or what we normally think of as IQ. Mayerunsettling state as temporary, isolated and changeable
and Salovey soon developed the concept ofwhile the pessimist views it as permanent, pervasive
emotional intelligence (EQ).and immutable. Optimists see the possibility of change
Dan Goleman picked up on the theme in his 1995and pessimists see the chains of the present.
best-selling book Emotional Intelligence: Why it CanThe moods of a leader are important because moods
Matter More than IQ. One of the seminal studies ofare contagious and move swiftly from person to
Goleman's book involved star performers at theperson. A leaders' predominate mood often becomes
prestigious Bell Laboratories near Princeton University.the mood of the organization, which can determine
Managers were asked to identify the top performerslong-term success or failure.
among the engineers and scientists that worked there.Optimism, anxiety, depression and confidence are
All of the engineers and scientists were presumed tolong-lasting states of being that endure great time
have high IQs to perform their jobs, yet somespans. Emotions tend to be shorter lived and triggered
emerged as outstanding, while others were justby events. However, our mood often determines our
average.emotional response to an event. When we encounter
Goleman used standard IQ and personality tests onan event that requires emotional skills, our ability is
both groups and found no substantial cognitiveeither diminished or enhanced by our mood.
difference between the stars and the averageBenchmarking and testing for EQ
workers. Based on this study, Goleman wrote in theThe difference between a manager and a leader is
Harvard Business Review that academic talent wastypically 90 percent EQ skills. Managers are often
not a good predictor of on-the-job productivity, norappointed to their positions not because of their
was IQ.management skills but because of their knowledge and
After detailed interviews, the social scientist detectedexperience. Some mangers go on to become great
critical differences. The stars had built networks of keyleaders, while others become only good managers-and
people. They used their strong interpersonal skills tosome don't even do that.
create informal teams of competent people who theyTo use EQ as a hiring tool, many companies
could rely on when needed. The same interpersonalbenchmark a position's top and bottom performers for
skills helped them build harmony among theiremotional intelligence. The benchmarking process
co-workers and managers. Goleman saw thisidentifies traits that are present in top performers and
team-building skill as a requisite for superiorabsent in the bottom rank. Companies can then test
performance.potential candidates for those traits or EQ
Goleman's research led him to conclude that leaderscompetencies required by the job.
drive action by building relationships, recognizing theirTwo tests are available that effectively measure a
own emotions, responding to the needs of others andperson's EQ. The MSCEIT, developed by Mayer,
by revealing their own mistakes. He termed theseSalovey and David Caruso, was the first EQ test. A
traits emotional intelligence (EQ) and defined it generallymore updated test was developed by Rueven Bar-On,
as the ability to recognize, understand, use anda psychologist who coined the term "emotional
manage emotions in oneself and in others. Unlikequotient." The Bar-On model (more widely used and
cognitive intelligence, emotional intelligence can bevalidated than the MSCEIT) tests in five general areas:
taught and learned.• Intra-Personal - ability to be aware of, manage, and
Key traits of emotional intelligenceexpress emotions
People with high EQs tend to have five qualities or• Inter-Personal - ability to initiate and maintain
competencies in common:relationships with others
• Optimism--ability to anticipate the best possible• Adaptability - ability to be flexible, solve problems
outcome of events or actionsand be realistic
• Self-Awareness--knowledge of current emotional• Stress Management - ability to tolerate stress and
state, strengths and weaknessescontrol impulses
• Empathy--understanding of others' points of view• General Mood - happiness and optimism levels
and decision-making processesI like to approach the identification of EQ competencies
• Impulse Control--ability to mitigate an urge to actessential to a job from both external and internal
(as in: think first and act later)viewpoints. The external approach requires a carefully
• Reality Testing--ability to see things as they are,crafted, facilitated session where five to seven people
not as we want them to bein an organization are tapped for their insight into the
The more of the qualities and person possesses, andEQ competencies they believe are needed for
the more they use them, the higher EQ they typicallysuperior job performance in a particular position. The
have.internal approach involves assessing superior
Moodiness and leadershipperformers currently on the job to see what
Do moody leaders make better leaders? The answercompetencies dominate. Ideally, an organization should
is: it depends on the prevailing mood. Is the leaderdo both and combine the results, but often the job is
optimistic and happy, or pessimistic and depressed?new and has no incumbent to assess. In that case, an
Few people will give their full support to a gloomy,organization can rely on the external results alone.
cynical leader, at least for very long. Their negativeThe above approach allows for both applicants and
nature, not to mention lack of positive feedback, leadsincumbents to be assessed and matched against
to high workplace turnover and may even causebenchmarks. The goal is to give a clear, quantifiable
some malcontents to sabotage an organization inpicture of what drives performance in a particular job,
revenge.and also to identify opportunities to leverage strengths
Happiness-and the attractive aura it produces-is bothand manage around individual weaknesses.
an emotion and a mood enhancer. The latest researchMost organizations want, but do not have, superior
indicates that happy people enjoy life more and liveperformers. By learning more about EQ, mapping job
longer than unhappy people. No surprise, since contentcandidates to benchmarks and creating a more
people focus on the positive and surround themselvesintentional hiring process your organization can happily
with like people - not to mention they are more willingbe an exception.
to embrace change. The "mantle of happiness" isVistage speaker Stephen Blakesley is Managing
thought to influence people simply because happinessPartner of GMS Talent L P, in Houston TX. He is the
attracts attention. Now we also know something else:author of The Target-The Secret to Superior
Happiness has an observable, positive impact onPerformance, Strategic Hiring: Tomorrow's Benefits
productivity.Today, and a contributing author to Pfeiffer Annual
This might all sound obvious, and yet how often doConsulting Yearbook.