Globalization; Challenges to the Equalization of Opportunities to the Disability Movement

INTRODUCTIONproportionate increase in the global number of people
Human communities worldwide have tended to movewith disabilities (Harwood et al, 2004). It is forecast that
gradually to develop closer associations over a longover the period, the Indian Sub-continent could have an
time. However, lately the speed of the movementincrease in population of approximately 120%, China,
appears to have considerably accelerated. For70%, the Sub-Saharan Africa, 257% and Burkina Faso,
instance, the invention of the jet planes, the computerCongo, Liberia, Niger, Somalia, Palestine, Uganda, could
chip, and availability of electronic mail (email), cheaphave a combined increase of over 400%. (Harwood
telecommunication services, huge but fast sea vessels,et al, 2004).
instantaneous financial transactions across national Disability in the Global Context
borders, all seem to contribute to the movement toThere is growing evidence that disability as an issue
make the globe even more mutually dependent thanseems to have shifted significantly over the past few
ever. The production and provision of branded goodsyears from the periphery to the centre of the
and services by transnational corporations (TNCs)international human rights agenda (Mett, 2004;1), and
such as Coca- Cola, Colgate-Palmolive, Dulux Paints,also of numerous literature that disability policy agenda
Barclays Bank Gestetner, McDonalds, Kentucky Friedhas risen to be a global policy issue (Barton &
Chickens, Nandos, Dunlop, and Ford to name a few,Oliver, 1987; Priestley 2001); and also that it has
marketed throughout the world, all seem to contributebecome a challenge to policy planners who map out
to make the globe a more symbiotic place. Thedevelopment oriented policies and strategies for social
exchange of information and communicationand economic programmes for disabled people. The
technological knowledge along with products andprocesses of globalization seem to be shifting not only
finances, ideas and cultures now seem to circulatethe populations of person with disabilities but also their
more liberally. And this seems to be the current andexperience of disability. People with disabilities globally
future trend.seem to be  empowering themselves to assert
Globalization undoubtedly, appears to be one of thegreater involvement and equality in global challenges
most prominent aspects of the present century.affecting them. Such claims are not only about control
Consequently, laws, economies, and socialover individuals' lives, but also about greater influence
engagements seem to now form at the global level.over the societies and economies within which they
Professionals, politicians, intellectuals and journalistslive (Swain, Finklestein, French and Oliver, 1993). Thus,
seem to treat the global trends as both predictablethe observance of the International Day of Disabled
and generally welcome. And for some of the world'sPersons ( IDDP) declared in 1982 and commemorated
population, globalization has increasingly become aon 3 December tends to focus on the active
catchphrase or buzzword and may mean getting ridinvolvement of disabled persons in the planning of
of the old ways of life and hostile livelihoods andstrategies and policies that affect their lives. The annual
cultures (Guinness, 2003).observance of the day, with the slogan "Nothing about
However, signs of globalization of the past fewUs without Us," seems to offer an opportunity to
decades are recent compared to at least four otherfoster changes in attitudes towards disabled persons
major phases that appear to have shrunk the worldto eliminate barriers to their full participation in all
throughout history. Historically, globalization can beaspects of life (Stone, 1997; Rowland, 2001; Swain, et al
viewed as having been signaled by;1993).
- The cross-oceanic European voyages of discoveryThe declaration of 1981 as the International Year of the
from 1492 to about 1565 (Guinness, 2003).Disabled Person (IYDP) further elevated disability onto
- The forced migration and translocation of Africansthe international human rights agenda (Priestley 2001).
and Indians into slavery and indentured labour to theA major outcome of the International Year of the
plantations in the West Indies.Disabled Persons was the formation of the World
- The massive human migration of the 1930 fromProgrammes of Action concerning Disabled Persons,
Europe and Asia to the Americas (Ingstad and Whyte,which the United Nations General Assembly adopted
1995).at its 37th regular session in 1982, by its resolution 37
- The economic depression of the 1930s (Stiglitz, 2002).52 (United Nations, 1982). Subsequent International
 While each of these earlier episodes of globalizationYears were supposed to bring focus to a particular
saw rapid growth in world economy, Guinness (2003),area and create new links and opportunities (Swain, et
contends that they tended to exert a heavy human tollal. 1993).
especially on the less economically developed nation In Southern African countries like Malawi, Zimbabwe,
states. In addressing the challenges and opportunitiesBotswana, South Africa, the motto has been "Disability
of globalization, there currently appears to beis Not Inability" (Salmonsson, 2006). This slogan and
increasing global concerns with both the positive andmotto tend to rely on the principle of participation, and
negative impacts of this phenomenon on the local,has been used by disabled people's organizations
national and international levels of developments in allthroughout the years as part of the global disability
spheres be they social, political, or economic (Priestley,movement, to achieve the full participation and
2001). Of concern in this essay, is the area of disabilityequalization of opportunities for, by and with disabled
and how globalization has impacted on the challengespersons (Watermeyer, Swartz, Lorenzo, Schneider
or opportunities for disabled people.& Priestley (2006). Therefore, to disentangle the
Although Lauder, Brown, Dillabough and Halsey (2006)lived experience of disability from the social context of
note that most researchers on globalization havedisabling societies at the local, national, and global levels
tended to focus on particular aspects, globalization,appears impossible.
however, appears to be multi-dimensional (Waters, Thus, the recognition of disabled people, to improve
1995; Cheng, 2004). Hence, perceptions on thetheir lives has been demonstrated by the United
phenomenon tend to be varied and accordingly, theNations, as is implied in the active involvement of
definitions of the term so far postulated, appeardisabled persons in the on-going elaboration of the
"fuzzy". And indeed Lauder et al (2006) observe thatConvention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
there is no agreed definition as yet because it appears(United Nations, 2006), and in the Standard Rules for
globalization represents a process that is never endingthe Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with
and cannot be thought of as either cyclic orDisabilities (UNESCO, 1993). These conventions seem
evolutionarily progressing from simple to complex.to have proved to be excellent examples of how the
Indeed, with a new crop of writers such as Brown andprinciple of full participation can be put into practice and
Lauder (1996), Schirato and Webb (2003), Stiglitzhow disabled people can contribute to the
(2002), Burbules and Torres (2000) and Bottery (2004),development of truly inclusive communities to shape a
to mention a few, it appears a plethora of conceptsbetter future for all.
which include, technological globalization, economic The United Nations' establishment of the World
globalization and learning globalization, environmentalProgrammes of Action, led to the UNESCO
globalization, demographic globalization, AmericanFramework for Action of the World Conferences on
globalization, (Nye, 2002) cultural globalization politicalEducation for All held in 1990 in Jomtien (Thailand), The
globalization (Bottery, 2004) emerged, advancing newSalamanca Statement and Framework for Special
insights into the meaning of globalization. The list of theNeeds Education (UNESCO, 1994) and the Dakar
kinds of "globalization" appears endless and is on-going,Framework on Education for All  (UNESCO, 2002).
as debate on the phenomenon continues to forgeTo demonstrate the importance of placing disability on
ahead. But according to Bottery (2004), some kinds ofthe global level, more than one hundred and fifty-five
globalization are more pressing in their immediatecountries from all over the world were represented by
effects than others. This paper examines and definesleaders of government, international agencies,
globalization from a general perspective and alsonon-governmental organizations and professional
explores how the globalization process has "pressed"bodies who committed themselves to recognizing the
on the creation of challenges and, or opportunities foreducation of all disabled individuals, attended the
disabled people worldwide. Other terms such asJomtiem conference (Ndawi, 1997). The Dakar World
"disability" that are embedded within the globalizationEducation Forum conference, in April 2000 attracted
context will be defined as the discussion unfolds.more than 1,100 participants from one hundred and
What is globalization?sixty four countries (UNESCO, 2002). Participants
While the terms "globe" and  "global" appear to haveranged from teachers to prime ministers, academics to
been in English usage for over four centuries, the nounpolicymakers, non-governmental bodies to the heads
form "globalization" did not seem to be in common useof major international organizations. They adopted the
until about 1960 (Guinness, 2003). According toDakar Framework for Action, Education for All
Weekley (1967), in "An Etymological Dictionary of(UNESCO, 2002). The Dakar Conference was
Modern English", the term "globalization" was firstcomplemented by earlier conferences which all
recognized in 1959 but remained dormant until theaddressed issues related to the challenges and
mid-1980s when its usage increased dramatically inempowerment of disabled people. These were
academic language (Guinness, 2003). To somenamely, the Sub-Saharan Conference on Education for
authors, the term seems to refer to the emergence ofAll held in South Africa in 1999; Asia and Pacific
transnational organizations whose decisions tend toConference on Education For All held in Bangkok in
shape and constrain the policy options any particular2000; The Arab Regional Conference on Education for
nation state may wish to take (Burbules and Torres,All held in Cairo; The Third Inter-Ministerial  Review
2000). To yet others, globalization may mean theMeeting on the E-9 Countries held in Recife, Brazil;
"transition from national ‘walled' and regionalConference on Education for All in Europe and North
economies towards global ‘free' trade andAmerica held in Warsaw, Poland in 2000 and The
markets" (Lauder,et. al. 2006; 30). It may also, to yetRegional Education for All Conference in the Americas
others mean the impact of global economic processesheld in Santa Domingo, Dominican Republic in 2000
that include production of standardized goods and(UNESCO, 2002).
services, consumption patterns and financial GLOBAL DISABILITY CHALLENGES TO THE
interdependence and "footloose" capital flows (BrownEQUALIZATION OF OPPORTUNITIES
and Lauder, 1996). To still others, globalization meansIt appears disabled people are most challenged in four
the appearance of new global cultural forms, media,fronts, namely, by poverty, wars, access to education
information and communication technologies, whichand work.
seem unrestricted by national borders (Held, 1991). It isPoverty
perhaps, to political skeptics, where globalization can beWith the disability policy agenda having reached the
viewed as a mental construct utilized by the statehighest levels of global recognition, globalization seems
polity to garner support for or to squash opposition toto have constructed a universe that offers endless
reform resulting from mightier forces such as globalopportunities and new life patterns to all; for instance
trade competitions instigated by the World Tradeeasy access to education, information and technology,
Organization (WTO): or responses to structuralhealth and social amenities and etcetera. But, according
adjustment programme (SAPs) demands of theto Ghai (2001), the paradox is that on the one hand,
Bretton Woods Institutes-the World Bank andglobalization places emphasis on economic power to
International Monetary Fund) (Brown, 1999): or toimprove the livelihood of mankind but on the other,
obligations to fulfill agreements of intergovernmentalmethodically marginalizes certain groups of people, in
organizations or regional economic blocs (Held, 1991)particular disabled people by its use of modern
such as the European Union, The North American Freetechnology and its removal of these people from
Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Economic Commission ofparticipating to contributing to the gross national
West African States (ECOWAS), the Southernproduct of individual nation states. And in this way,
African Development Committee (SADC), or theglobalization seems to have created challenges to the
Organization for Economic Co-operation andequalization of opportunities to disabled people. More
Development (OECD), that leave the nation state withso, the apparent disparity in economic, social and
no option but to play along an imposed set of globaltechnological developments between the different
rules (Burbules and Torres, 2000).Guinness (2003; 3)nation states has led globalization to seem to have a
posits that the nature of certain jobs tends to influencedifferent meaning for disabled people and to challenge
views when thinking of globalization. For instance, tothem differently in the different communities (Ghai,
Kofi Annan (the former United Nations Secretary2001); with some communities wealthier than others.
General) globalization may mean "world inclusivity"; toPoverty seems to be afflicting the half a billion disabled
depots and other like minded dictators, globalizationpeople or so in the world today, According to Ghai
may be perceived as meaning a threat to the national(2001), more disabled people seem to be suffering on
sovereignty of their nation states. While to Bill Gates ofevery continent, perhaps more than ever before. Most
Microsoft Corporation, globalization may meanof them are on the lowest end of the socio-economic
connecting the world virtually in cyberspace, by ascale (Beresford, 1996; Frieden, 2002).
world wide web. Thus, myriad views on globalization Consequently, disabled people have tended to be
surfaced as the concept ignited across a wide rangemore vulnerable to, their incapability to combat poverty,
of intellectual interests with some views on the oneexclusion, stigma and lack of access to basic
end vilifying the concept and on the other, praising iteducation and services. Disabled people seem to
(Stiglitz, 2002).experience poverty more intensely but have fewer
The use and popularity of the term "globalization" mayopportunities to escape from it. A former President of
be partly due to its vagueness and ability to assumethe World Bank observed this and asserted that
different dimensions depending on the user and"unless disabled people are brought into the
context. Held and Koenig–Archibugi (2003) anddevelopment mainstream, it will be impossible to cut
Schirato and Webb (2000; 1) concur and describepoverty by half by 2015..." (Richler, 2005, 37). Hence,
globalization as a word that is often used to designateaccording to Beresford 1996), combating global
the global power relations, practices and technologiespoverty is a key issue in the disability movement.
that characterize, and help to bring into being the Wars and political upheavals
contemporary world. Robertson (1992) definesAnother aspect that appears to challenge the
globalization as a concept that refers both to theequalization of opportunities for disabled people is war
compression of the world and the intensification ofand its associated political upheavals (Priestley, 2001).
consciousness of the world as a whole. Waters (2001),As Driedger (1987) observed, war and political
in coining his definition argues that the most appropriateupheaval have had adverse effects on disabled
way of defining globalization would be to predict whatpeoples' lives and their rights seem grossly violated in
a totally globalized world would appear to be like in thewar times anywhere in the world; effectively excluding
future. Waters (2001) therefore, visualizes globalizationthem from participating in the social and capital
as being characterized by a single global society with acapacity building of affected nations. Priestley (1987)
single culture, where there are no territorial boundariesalso notes that wars have resulted in millions of
which, in that status quo, seem to exist in principle fordisabled refugees and displaced persons in and around
organizing social and cultural life and where there couldwar tone zones. Supposedly, in Central Africa, the
be high regard for tolerance, diversity and individualMiddle East, and Afghanistan and in Central America,
choice. Waters (2001) also views the flow of trade aswar is perceived as a major cause of disability.
well as migration of people and ideas across nationalAnti-personnel landmines have also massively
and political boundaries, as being interlinked and thus,contributed to causing disability of various sorts and
forcing previously homogenous cultures to rationalizethus the achievement of peace has become a global
each other. Thus, globalization can be perceived s adisability issue. The European Union's commitment to
process that simultaneously differentiates anderadicate landmines on a global scale seems illustrative,
homogenizes and consequently "pluralizing the worldbut the role of the United Nations in this matter
by recognizing the value of cultural niches" (Guinness,appears "invisible".
2003; 2). From this vantage therefore, Waters (2001) In a speech to the European Union parliament, the
defines globalization as;European Union's Commissioner for External Affairs
A process in which the constraints of  geography onnoted that one hundred and forty four countries have
economic, social and cultural arrangements recede, inso far ratified the Mines Ban Treaty (Waldner, 2005).
which people become increasingly aware that theyNumerous other summits have been held to discuss
are receding and in which people act accordingly.the reduction of the number of people either killed or
 To an extent, Waters' definition of globalizationmaimed by landmines. Waldner conceded that the
seems to concur with Stiglitz's (2002; 9) descriptionannual number of landmine victims has dropped from
when he says globalization is fundamentally,the closer26 000 to below 15 000 (Waldner, 2005). The Disabled
integration of countries and peoples of the world whichPeoples International (DPI, 1998) took issue with this
has been brought about the enormous reduction ofmatter at their World Assembly in 1998 in Mexico City
costs of transportation and communication, and theand a subsequent visit by the DPI World Council to
breaking down of artificial barriers to the flow ofHiroshima, the site of the Second World War atomic
goods, services, capital , knowledge and …peoplebomb, resulted in the International Peace Declaration by
across borders.the global disability organizations.
To Waters (2001), globalization, not only is it a major However, war and political upheaval have ironically
historical process that impacts heavily on culture but isalso, had a positive impact on the lives of disabled
also, a central focus of attention of modern culture andpeople. In countries where there were revolutions such
economy. He contends that globalization has aas Vietnam, Kenya, Zimbabwe, South Africa, Namibia
tendency to take issues from the centre levels to theand Nicaragua, Ingstad and Whyte (1995) and Montero
periphery. For instance, through the speedy and(1998), observe that disabled people, in the process
continuous transmission of the "so-called" westernwere venerated and  "practically considered national
culture to peripheral communities, And vice versa,heroes and were given all the opportunities possible to
globalization has also tended to bring issues, fromdevelop and strengthen their organizations", and to
peripheral levels to the centre. For instance, the area ofaccess funding, education, jobs, and other services.
disability to be discussed below, has been takenWar veterans seemed to experience disability in
seriously onto the agendas of supra national institutionspositively very different ways as compared to those
such as the United Nations, International Labourdisabled before the revolutions.
Organization The Bretton Woods Institutes and theWork
World Health Organization or to organizations thatFor many disabled people, the demand for access to
have merged  with existing ones to function acrosswork may be perceived as a major signifier of
borders. In this sense, it appears to me that the Unitedindependent adulthood and a crucial component to the
Nations' programme of work on globalization is instruggle for equality. Yet, as Priestley (2001; 8) asserts,
response to the changing international context todisabled people globally "continue to be
promote effective development oriented disabilitydisproportionately unemployed, underemployed and
policies and strategies.  Accordingly, the aim of theunderpaid…"  This assertion is reflected in, for
United Nations through various arms such as theinstance in the focus of the British Government's
World Bank, World Health Organization, World Tradeproposal to tackle oppression of disabled people on
Organization, to name a few, is to ensure that disabilitythe work place (Barton and Oliver, 1997). The British
policies and strategies and globalization functionGovernment cut back on the Access to Work
together to improve the health, welfare and rights ofscheme and the disabled people's organizations fought
the poor as well as the disadvantaged populationthat decision asserting that the right to a job is a
(World Health Organization, 2005).fundamental human right (Barton and Oliver, 1997).
Disability as a global concept: Historical background andSuch challenges for access to jobs by disabled people
definition of disability.appear to have become common in many countries.
Disability is one socio-cultural issue that appeared toHence in 1983, the International Labour Organization
have remained in the periphery but  has currentlyadopted a Convention Concerning Vocational,
been brought to the centre of most global agenda. It isRehabilitation and Employment (Disabled Persons) (ILO,
a term sometimes confused with two other terms1983) to ensure equality of opportunities and
"impairment and handicap. The terms "disability"equalization of treatment of disabled people at work
"impairment" and "handicap" were often usedand social integration. However, despite much effort at
interchangeably but in an unclear and confusing way,the global level to include disabled people in the work
and may have tended to give poor guidance toworld, at the local level, some would continue to be
policy-makers, for political action as well as for practicalexcluded by their impairments because some tend not
use. The terms used to be perceived from a medicalto be capable of producing goods or services to
and diagnostic angle (Shakespear, 2006).contribute to the social and economic capital base. To
 What is a Disability?this, Barton and Oliver (1997;35) comment that this is so
Disability is a phenomenon that exists in all societies"because in any society........certain products are of value
and tends to affect predictable proportions of eachand others are not regardless of the efforts that go
population (Metts, 2004). Although there are a numberinto their production."
of definitions in use to describe disability, disability largely Education
depends upon context. And apparently, universally, itEducation occupies a unique position in modern society
appeared there was no agreed definition of disabilitytoday because it tends to benefit both society and the
until 1980. Historically, disability was on the one hand,individual as it is considered a public good
viewed as a medical condition, with a medical problem(Psacharopoulos and Woodhall (1985). The advances
located within the individual. Hence, some definitionsin knowledge and scientific understanding seem to
tended to reflect this understanding that disability wasstrengthen the optimism that society holds of
an individual pathology; i.e. a condition grounded in theeducation (Lauder et al.2006). Education offers
physiological, biological and intellectual impairment of anoptimism to influence the well being of people and
individual (Shakespear, 2006). The medical definitionsnation state because according to Lauder et al. (2006),
gave rise to the idea that people were "objects" to beeducation is perceived by almost all people as the
"treated", "changed" or "improved" and made moremeans by which to improve individuals' lives and an
"normal" (Wolfensburger, 1972). The medical definitionsunderstanding of their place in the world.
tended to perceive the disabled person as having to.Typically, therefore, as global market trends and
"fit in" rather than about how society itself shouldtechnologies continue to develop in new pathways,
transform. They did not seem to adequately explaineducation tends to become commdified and free
the relationship between societal conditions oraccess to education seems to also become even
expectations and the unique circumstances of anmore important for everyone. However, disabled
individual.people seem to continue to be challenged in their quest
Disability can be viewed as a highly varied andto access educational opportunities available. In their
complex condition with a range of implications forzeal to acquire knowledge and skills needed in the
social identity and behaviour (Ingstad and Whyte, 1995).evolving world of work, Peters (1996) notes that the
Therefore, a growing realization to articulate a definitioninequitable access to educational benefits results in the
of disability, which was in conformity with human rightsinaccessibility to work; thereby propelling further the
values, principles and practices was needed. Whilstcreation of an impoverished community. In some
some disabled people may have medical conditionssocieties, for instance the Pakistani, disabled girl children
which impede them and which may or may not requireeducation is not considered important (Shah, 1990). And
medical treatment, current knowledge, technology andfrom a personal viewpoint, it appears this perspective
collective resources are already such that theiris in existence among some religious communities in
physical or mental impairments need not prevent themSouthern Africa. Such barriers to access to education
from participating in community lives. According tochallenge many disabled people and compel them to
Rieser and Mason (1990), it is society's unwillingness tobe dependant upon their families in many countries
employ these means to altering itself that causes(Priestley, 2001). In addressing these matters, the United
disabilities. But, it seems at the centre of society, liesNations, through the various protocols such as the
the values that respect the variation in human culturesSalamanca Statement, the Dakar Framework, the
and the appreciation that people are different onJomtien Conference and others, seeks to
several considerations such as gender, race, class,Ensure equal educational opportunities at all levels for
sexuality, and disability (Lauder, et al, 2006; 29).children, youth and adults with disabilities in integrated
On the other hand , while the medical model seemedsettings, taking into full account of individual differences
to be in vogue, it was challenged by disability activistsand situations (World Summit on Social Development,
who reconstructed disability as a social phenomenonCommitment 6, item f, 1995). Consequently, at the
(Shakespear, 2006). The social model of disabilitynational level, governments the world over have had to
seems to draw a clear distinction betweenformulate legislation and initiatives consistent with the
impairments, handicaps and disability, because societyvision of the United Nations.
tends to ignore the imperfections and deficiencies ofHowever, in most African States, these policies and
the surrounding environment which in turn tends tolegislation were absent and a concerted effort was
disable people by its failure to recognize andmade to put them in place through the African
accommodate differences. And also, through theUnions'   Continental Plan of Action which is aimed at
attitudinal and institutional barriers it erects towardsimplementing priority activities on disability during the
people.  Disability thus seems to arise from a complexAfrican Decade of Persons with Disabilities
interaction between health conditions, the social(1999-2009) (Secretariat of the African Decade, 2004).
context in which they exist and the individual. To some,In order to create an equitable society in Africa, the
disability is a relative term with certain impairmentsSecretariat of the African Decade facilitates the
becoming more or less disabling in different contexts.development of highly progressive policies and
In 1980, the World Health Organization (WHO) classifiedlegislation, which if properly used, can over periods
the terms disabilities, impairments and handicaps, anddrastically reform the social disadvantages
suggested a universal, more precise and at the sameexperienced by all disabled persons. For example,
time realistic approach to their definitions and useGhana adopted the Free, Compulsory and Universal
Metts, 2004;3). The World Health Organization made aBasic Education (FCUBE) (Sawyerr 1997), initiative in
clear distinction between "impairment", "disability" andline with this United Nations vision. In Zimbabwe, the
"handicap". However, there were concerns that theBasic Education Assistance Module (BEAM) was
definition of the terms "impairment" and "handicap" mayinitiated cognizant of the same vision. The USA initially
still be considered too medical and too centred on thepassed Public Law 92-142 (PL 92-142) Education for
individual, and may not adequately clarify the interactionAll Handicapped Persons Act (Gearheart, Weishahn
between societal conditions or expectations and theand Gearheart, 1982). Then in 1975, the American
abilities of the individual. Hence, the need to separateCongress enacted the Individuals with Disabilities
and clarify the meanings of these terms. ByEducation Act (IDEA) from which initiatives like the "No
description, the term "disability" tends to summarizeChild Left Behind" (NCLB) (Astoria 2007), were born. In
different functional limitations occurring in individualsthe United Kingdom, the "Every Child Matters" Green
anywhere in the world. People may be disabled byPaper (The Stationery Office, 2003) is similar in
physical, intellectual or sensory limitations, medicalprinciple to the American IDEA. 
conditions or mental illness. Such limitations or illnesses Several nations have put in place similar protocols to
may be permanent or temporary (United Nations,deal with equalization of educational opportunities to all
1993).people in their systems. To emphasize this, the United
 The term "handicap" tends to mean the loss orNations Copenhagen Declaration on Social
limitation of opportunities to participate in the life of theDevelopment included specific pledges on equal
community on an equal level with others (Ingstad andeducational opportunities for disabled children and
Whyte, 1995). It may describe the encounter betweenyoung people. (World Summit on Social Development
the disabled person and their environment. The term1995).
emphasizes the focus on the shortcomings in sociallyA PERSONAL THOUGHT
organized environmental activities; such as, access toIt may be naïve to conclude that globalization alone
information, communication technology, health serviceshas caused the challenges experienced by disabled
and to education, which prevent disabled persons frompeople, or that nothing can be done to improve the
participating on equal terms with everybody elseequalization of opportunities in their situations. In real
(Ingstad and Whyte, 1995). Although the term continuesessence, it appears; the less developed countries have
in use, its technical use was, according to Stone (1997)not been able to integrate disabled people within the
discarded by the United Nations in 1993. During theglobal economic and social development as quickly as
1970s there had been a strong rejection amongothers, partly because of their chosen policies and
representatives of organizations of disabled personspartly because of factors outside their control such as
and professionals in the field of disability of the term atimposed economic structural adjustment programmes
the time (Ingstad and Whyte, 1995). The term(SAPs), debt burden caused by the Bretton Wood
"impairment" can be defined to mean "any loss orInstitutes and wars and conflict. In my opinion however,
abnormality of psychological, physiological orit appears no nation state, least of all the poorest, can
anatomical structure or function" (WHO, 1980). Theafford to remain isolated from the global social and
distinction and clarification of the terms "disability" andeconomic capacity building initiatives. Every country
"impairment" and "handicap" seemed to perch theshould seek to provide for the needs and access to
views on the medical and social models of disability inthe basic services of all its citizens in order to reduce
opposition to each other. This seemed to pave thechallenging situations and to increase equal opportunity
way for a new and seemingly acceptable disabilityinitiatives to ameliorate suffering among its disabled
model framed along Human Rights. In the light ofpeople populations.  The self organization of disabled
modern society values, it was a model, appealing topeople into groups seems to raise their values and
both advocates of equal rights and the United Nationsvoices, and is also a fundamental right that disabled
(Shakespear, 2006).people should continue to exercise. Through
 In 1975 the United Nations General Assembly madeglobalization principles, the international community
its first Declaration on the Rights of the Disabledshould endeavour to invest in disabled people. On
Persons (Priestley, 2001). After the declaration, theeconomic grounds, investment in disabled people is
United Nations proclaimed 1981 as the Internationaljustified as long as the consequential capital investment
Year of the Disabled Persons and commenced on thedoes not exceed the cost of benefits derived.  .
development of World Programmes of Action that ledCONCLUSION
to the adoption of the Standard Rules on theIn conclusion, this essay discussed the concepts of
Equalization of Opportunities for Persons withglobalization and disability. Descriptions and definitions of
Disabilities in 1994 (United Nations, 1993).  As a resultboth terms were made. Within the globalization
of the experiences gained during the 1983-1992concept, disability was discussed. Then a historical
Decade of Disabled Persons, in the implementation offramework of disability in the global context was
the World Programmes of Action and of the generalsuggested. It seems definitions of disability vary across
discussions that took place, there was a deepening ofcommunities. The challenges that face disabled people
knowledge and understanding concerning disabilityin their zeal to achieve full independence in the control
issues and the terminology used. At the same timeof their lives and to contribute to the social and
disability was more clearly defined (Priestley, 2001;economic capacity were also highlighted. However, as
Ingstad and Whyte, 1995). (Although multi-culturally,globalization progresses; living conditions seem to
there still seemed to be problems in defining disability inimprove significantly in virtually all countries. But that the
a global context-for instance, how could imperfectionseconomic disparities between developed and less
of the body and of the mind be understood in differentdeveloped countries seem to have grown wider and
societies? Or how could a person's culturally definedwars and political upheaval as well the incapability of
identity be affected by one's disability? (Ingstad andescaping from poverty are matters of concern that
Whyte, 1995). Hence, according to Haddad (2001),seem to affect the majority of disabled people. The
President of the Canadian Medical Association, thenumber of the world's citizens who are in poverty
term, disability, tends to have various meaningsseems disturbing- let along among the population of the
depending on the context in which the term is used.disabled people.          
However, for the purpose of this essay the WorldReferences
Health Organization (WHO) functional definition ofAstoria W., (2007) "President Bush Discusses No Child
disability shall be used. The World Health OrganizationLeft behind Reauthorization"Paper by the Press
definition of disability is framed on the model of theSecretary,Office of the White House, New
International Classification of Diseases and "because itYork: September 26th.                 
attempts to categorize the consequence of disease, it(ONLINE
includes a consideration of social contexts" and at theBarton L. and Oliver, M., (1987) Disability Studies; Past,
same time captures aspects of Human Rights (IngstadPresent and Future, Leeds: The University Press.
and Whyte, 1995; 5). According to this classification,Beresford, P. (1998), "Poverty and disabled people;
disability is defined as "any restriction or lack of abilitychallenging dominant debates and policies", Disability
to perform an activity in the manner or within the& Society, Vol. 11, No.4 pp. 553-567.
range considered normal for a human being" (Mett,Bottery, M., (2004) "Education and Globalization:
2004; 3)Redefining the Role of the Educational Professional"
 However many governments and organizationsPaper presented at the Inaugural Professional Lecture,"
appear to have adapted this definition and developedInstitute for Learning, University of Hull, March 15th.
legislation to suit their own social and economicBrown, T. (1999) "Challenging globalization as discourse
situations as evidenced by the definitions from theand phenomenon", International Journal of Lifelong
following country examples. The Israeli Equal Rights forEducation, Vol. 18, No.1, pp.3-17.
People with Disabilities Law of 1998 notes a personBrown, P. and Lauder, H. (1996), "Education,
with a disability;as meaning "a person with a physical,Globalization and Economic Development", Journal of
emotional or mental disability, including a cognitiveEducational Policy, Vol. 11, No.1, pp. 1-25.
disability, permanent or temporary, as a result of whichBurbules, N and Torres, A.C., (2000) Globalization and
that person's functioning is substantially limited in one orEducation,  London: Routledge.
more the major spheres of life. (Wolfgang, PreiserCheng, Y.C., (2004) "Fostering local knowledge and
& Ostroff, 2003).human development in globalization of education",
United Kingdom Disability Discrimination Act of 1995International Journal of Educational Management, Vol.
notes that "a person has a disability... if he has a18,  No. 1, pp. 7-24.
physical or mental impairment which has a substantialDepartment for International Development, (2000)
and long-term adverse effect on his ability to carry out"Disability, Poverty and Development", Department for
normal day-to-day activities." (Department forInternational Development, (ONLINE-http: .
International Development 2000).Disabled People International, (1998) "Towards an
 In the Zimbabwe Disabled Persons Act of 1992 Inclusive 21st Century Mexico City, Disability
which was enacted after the war of political liberationAwareness in Action Newsletter 66, November.
a "disabled person" meansa person with a physical,Disability World, (200) "UNICEF & Disabled Children
mental or sensory disability, including a visual, hearing orand Youths" Bi-Monthly Newsletter of International
speech functional disability, which gives rise to physical,Disability, News and Views, Issue No. 19 June-August.
cultural or social barriers inhibiting him from participatingDriedger, D., (1987) 'Disabled People's International',
at an equal level with other members of society inRehabilitation Gazette, 28: pp. 13-14.
activities, undertakings or fields of employment that areFrieden L., (2002) "The Global Disability Community
open to other members of society (Government ofMust Respond to the Critical Challenges of the 21st
Zimbabwe, 1992).Century", Address to Rehabilitation International
Evidently, the few illustrations serve to show that theEuropean Conference in Aachen, Germany,
definition of disability seems to be framed along theNovember 11th.
individual circumstances and social contexts ofGearheart, B.R., Weishahn, M.W. and Gearheart, C.J.
particular nation states but also seems to imply an(1992) The Exceptional Student in the Regular
empowerment of disabled people through recognizingClassroom, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
them along equality of rights.Ghai, A., (2001) "Marginalization and Disability;
The global extent of disabilityExperiences from the Third World", In   Priestley M.,
To measure national regional and local disability(ed.), Disability and The Life Course; Global
populations, let alone the global population is accordingPerspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
to Metts (2004) almost impossible. There is therefore app.26-37.
wide variation in the estimated disability rates reportedGovernment of Zimbabwe, (1996) Disabled Persons
by the developed and developing countries (Thomas,Act,Harare: Government Printers.
2005). Most United Nations agencies, use estimatesGovernment of Zimbabwe, (1997) Inter-Censual
developed by the Rehabilitation International in theDemographic Survey, Harare: Government Printers.
1970s and by the United Nations DevelopmentGuiness, P, (2003) Globalization, London: Hodder &
Programme (1997) that approximately ten percent ofStoughton.
any given population are born with a disability orHaddad, H., (2001) "Proposals for legislation governing
acquire one during their lifetime (Disability World, 2003).assisted human reproduction", Paper presentation to
This however, appears to have changed over timethe House of Commons Canadian Medical Association
because in the United States of America as StoneStanding Committee on Health October 23rd.
(1997; 4) observed, the prevalence of disability, is aboutHarwood, R.H., Sayer, A. A. and Hirschfield, M., (2004)
twenty percent of the population. In developing nations'Current and Future Worldwide Prevalence of
and elsewhere, especially in Africa, the percentageDependency, its Relationship to Total population and
appears to be a lot lower that ten percent. TheDependency Rates', Bulletin of WHO, April, 2004, 82.
Zimbabwe Inter-Censal Demographic Survey of 1997pp. 4.
conducted by the Central Statistical Office establishedHeld, D., (1996) Political Theory Today, Stanford:
that out of a population of about twelve million, 218 421Stanford University Press.
persons were disabled (Government of ZimbabweHeld, D. and Koenig-Archibugi M. (2003) Taming
1997). This figure is less than 2% of the population butGlobalization; Frontiers of Governance, Cambridge:
in the developed countries, the  percentages arePolity Press.
higher. The SINTEF table below seems to give aIngstad, B. and Whyte, S., (eds), (1995) Disability and
sympnosis of the situation. This seems to be the trendCulture, Berkeley Ca., University of California Press.
globally. This is an irony, but not surprising, if the causesInternational Labour Organization, (1983) Convention
of disabilities were to be discussed. (Unfortunately thisConcerning Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment
paper will not discuss these because it would be a(Disabled Persons), Geneva, ILO, C159, June 20th.
detour from topic). However, at the global level, theLauder, H., Brown, P., Dillabough, J. A. and
United Nations note that the primary causes ofHasley, (2006) Education, Globalization and Social
disability are disease (51.2%e),  malnutrition (20%),Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 
accidents, war and trauma 15.6$% and other causes Metts, R., (2004) "Disability and Development", A
and aging 13.2%. (Metts, 2004).Background paper prepared fro the Disability and
 Apparently the variation in numbers in the differentDevelopment Research Agenda Meeting Washington
countries can also depend, to a large extent, on theD.C. World Bank, November 16th.
definitions of disability used, which either expand orNdawi, O.P., (1997) "Education for all by the year 2000
diminish the disability groups and also the difficulties inin some countries in Africa; Can teacher education
the data collection procedures and the differentensure the quantity, quality and relevance of that
assessment systems used in the different countries.Education?" International Journal of Educational
This may be a probable reason most data gatheredDevelopment, Vol. 17. No.2. pp. 121-128.
by national governments of the developing states areNye, J., (2002), The Paradox of American Power,
perceived by organizations working in disability, asOxford: Oxford University Press.
underestimating and downplaying the extent ofPriestley, M., (ed), (2001) Disability and the Life Course;
disability in their countries. However, to me, it appearsGlobal Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University
the research data may be representation of the realPress.
situation on the ground despite popular ‘western'Psacharopoulos,G. and Woodhall, M. (1985) Education
wisdom that the contrary may be true. The censusfor development : an analysis of investment
figures gathered by The Foundation for Scientific andchoices,New York: Oxford University Press, for the
Industrial Research (SINTEF) shown in the diagramWorld Bank.
overleaf seem to vindicate this representativeReiser, R. and Mason M. (1990) Disability Equality in the
scenario. The SINTEF report most probably reflectsClassroom; a Human Rights Issue, London: Education
the correct perspectives in the light that the worldResource Information Centre.
seems to be experiencing a demographic evolutionRichler, D., (2005) "Maintaining Disability in Development
and also that the more sophisticated urbanPrograms of African Countries: Promoting Inclusive
environments become, the more they tend to beEducation", In International Rehabilitation review, Vol.
disabling because they tend to erect barriers that limit55,No. 2, December.
or diminish human functioning; thus in a sense 'creating'Robertson, R, (1992). Globalization, London: Sage.
disabled people (Harwood, Sayer and Hirschfield,Rowland, W., (2001) "Nothing about us without us;
2004). (For instance a mentally challenged person inSome Historical Reflections on Disability Movement in
the unsophisticated agricultural farms of Africa isSouth Africa", Disability World Issue No. 11, Nov-Dec.
capable of productive activities in terms ofSalmonssnn, A., (2005), "Disability is not Inability",
demonstrating agricultural skills whereas if the sameBaseline Study towards inclusive Education In Blantyre,
person were brought to an urbanized environmentBalaka and Muchinga Districts in Malawi, Institute of
would become useless because the means ofPublic Management.
production in that situation differ and may presentSawyerr, H., (1997), "Successful African Experiences; A
challenges to the individual)review of Country-Led Aid Coordination in Ghana"
 Paris: Association for the Development of Education in
Developed countriesAfrica,
 Self Direction Community Project, (2002) The Medical
Developing countriesand Social Model of Disability Module, Salford:
CountryUniversity of Salford.
YearShah, F., (1990), "Disability, Self Help and Social Change",
%In Priestley, M., (2001), Disability and the Life Course;
 Global Perspectives, Cambridge, Cambridge University
CountryPress.
YearSchirato, T. & Webb, J., (2003) Understanding
%Globalization, London: Sage Publications.
CanadaSecretariat of the African Debate, (2004) "A brief
1991Overview of the mandate of the African Decade 
14.7for Disabled Persons Secretariat", Addis Ababa:
  African Union.
KenyaShakespear, T., (2000) Disability: Rights and Wrongs,
1989Oxon: Routledge.
0.7Stiglitz, J., (2003) Globalization and its discontents,
GermanyLondon: Penguin.
1992Stone, K.G., (1997) Awakening to Disability; Nothing
8.4About us Without Us, Mother Lode, Ca: Volcano Press.
 Swain, J., Finkelstein, V., French, S. and Oliver, M., (eds),
Namibia(1993) Disabling Barriers-Enabling Environments. London,
1991Sage Publications.
3.1The Foundation for Scientific and Industrial Research,
Italy(2003) "Living Conditions among People with Disabilities
1994in Zimbabwe: A Representative Regional
5.0Study"SINTEF, Oslo.
 The Stationery Office, (2003) The Green Paper; Every
NigeriaChild Matters, Norwich, The Stationery Office.
1991Thomas, P., (2005) "Mainstreaming Disability in
0.5Development: Country level Research India Country
NetherlandsReport Disability" Disability Knowledge and Research.
1986Project, DfID (ONLINE; -
11.6 United Nations, (1975) Declaration on the Rights of
 Disabled Persons, General Assembly Resolution 3447,
Senegal9, New York, United Nations.
1988United Nations, (1983). World Programme of Action
1.1Concerning Disabled Persons, New York: United
NorwayNations.
1995 United Nations, (1994) ‘Towards a society for all:
17.8Long-term Strategy to Implement the World
 Programme of Action concerning Disabled Persons to
South Africathe Year 2000 and Beyond', annex to Implementation
1980of the World Programme of Action concerning
0.5Disabled Persons, Report of the Secretary- General,
Sweden27 September.
1988 United Nations Development Programme, (1997),
12.1Human Development Report, New York, Oxford
 University:Press.
Zambia United Nations, (2006) Paper on "Global Disability
1990Network Adoption of the UN Convention on the Rights
0.9of Persons with Disabilities," New York, United Nations.
Spain UNESCO, (1989) Convention on the Rights of the
1986Child. New York: N.
15.0UNESCO, (1 993), Standard Rules on the Equalization
 of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities.  New
KenyaYork; UN.
1989 UNESCO, (1994), Final Report; World Conference on
0.7Special Education; Access  And Quality (Salamanca
UKDeclaration and Jomtien Framework for Action). Paris,
1991UNESCO.
12.2 UNESCO, (1995) "Disability Awareness In Action",
 New York: UNESCO.
Zimbabwe UNESCO, (2002) "Education for All, Is the World on
1997Track?" EFA Global Monitoring Report.
1.9 Waldner, B.F., (2005) "A World Without Landmines"
Table 1; Prevalence (%) of disability in selectedSpeech to the European Parliament Strasbourg, July
countries (The Foundation for Scientific and Industrial6th.
Research, SINTEF, 2004). Waters, M., (2001) Globalization, London: Routledge.
 Watermeyer, B, Swartz, L., Lorenzo, T., Schneider, M.
Another research by The Foundation for Scientific and& Priestley, M., (2006) Disability and Social Change;
Industrial Research (SINTEF) research done inA South African Agenda, Human Sciences, Cape
Zimbabwe seems to reinforce this assertion as itTown: Research Council.
found higher disability rates in urban than in rural areas,Weekley, E., (1967) An Etymological Dictionary of
suggesting that ‘complex societies in a senseModern English, Dover: Dover Publications.
produce disability'(Arne, Nhiwathiwa, Muderedzi, andWolfensburger, W., (1972) The Principle of
Loeb, 2003).   Normalization in Human Services, Toronto, National
 In the developed countries there also appears to beInstitute of Mental Retardation.
an increased life expectancy because of improvedWolfgang F, Preiser, E & Ostroff, E. (2003)
medical technology and health care meaning that moreUniversal design Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill.
people will reach old age and experience age relatedWorld Health Organization, (2005) "Globalization, Trade
disabilities (Harwood et al, 2004). Today, demographicand Health, Highlights of Products and activities 2004
statistics indicate that there are approximately more2005 "A Working Paper, New York, United Nations.
than half a billion people with disabilities globally. TheWorld Summit on Social Development, (1995) Report
World Health Organization predicts a huge increase inof the world summit for social Development",
the global population which is set to rise dramaticallyCopenhagen March, 6th -12th.
between 2000 and 2050.and consequently, a