Just Desert

The definition of 'just desert' means to which that isprevious destination. So they beat the sick man and
deserved. A reward for what has been done - goodone of them was shot by this Arkansas man; which
or bad. The question is who deserves what in thewas in self defense according to an article from
justice system and what do they deserve? The otheropposing viewpoints.
question is how much do they deserve? What isAccording to the outcome of the above situation; no
considered justice and what can be considered incharges will be filed against the Arkansas man
justice?because he acted in self-defense. Charges, including
There needs to be a balance of thought referring topossible charges of felony murder, are pending against
the critical thinking of what works and what doesn'tthe juveniles. At least three of the juveniles have prior
work in society and within the justice system. Thecriminal records. Does this sound like just desert?
justice realm of thought verses the everyday popularApparently; prior convictions of crimes inhibits the
hierarchy of political agendas is the arena of "justnotion of" innocent till proven guilty."
deserts"Capital punishment a political issue of debate carries
Does "just desert" fit a certain age or crime? Differentwith it strongholds of values and venues of common
strokes for different folks; seems to be the tune ofsense. Whatever happened to the idea of diminished
"just desert". What punishment is a defendant ofcapacity in which a defender could defend himself
20-40- years of age deserving of in relation to aaccording to his mental disabilities? What fairness is
defendant who commits the same crime and is 60there is "just desert' or is "just desert" just a fallacy of
years of age? What marks the difference? Is it thethought derived to accommodate the public in their cry
political views of the court? Or is it the justification offor "justice" for crimes committed?
the age involved; and for goodness sake this personSo, what is or not deserving? The various views and
should know better by now?counter arguments conceal knowledge of shaky
According to Kurt Williamsen, one situation in Wisconsindeliberation of morals and justice as collaborating
occurred in which a group of youths beat a man whoforces. There are doubts of true justice and true moral
had complained he had just gotten out of the hospitalstandards for punishments and related criminal related
and had no money. These youths had met him at atreatment. Who can really make the decisions for
gas station in Wisconsin. The boys had been taking aanyone's just desert? The real question can be
joyride. They realized when stopping at the gas stationanswered in the search for the truth in us as to what
they didn't have enough money to get back to theiris our"just desert"?